Thank you. He’s trying too hard to defend this guy for some reason lol
- Status
Cadaver Synod was actually based. Right up there with damnatio memorIae.
No, I'm just making a point about "innocent until proven guilty". But ****ers like you and Hillside keep avoiding that. You're convinced he's guilty so it doesn't matter anymore. It's a tag team of trolling and I'll let you have the "W" so I can move on with my evening.
He tends to apologize to the point of stupidity. The orange man hurt him and he takes it out on OSA.
Bless your pedo-loving heart..... I didn't say you mentioned Trump lol.
So your saying that children need to be molested before someone (who is an obvious pedophile) can be called pedophile. Sounds like you are advocating for child molestation.
Let a look at this a different way. Hypothetically if I was posting pictures of me with coke and strippers on social media, like this principal post pictures of himself in drag, and an employee in a safety sensitive position my employer would terminate me. Despite that I have never been convicted of cocaine possession nor have I ever been caught in legally compromised position with a stripper my termination would be justified. I would not meet the moral standards for my job.
Likewise this cross dressing pervert in charge of a school should be relieved of his position at minimum and in all honestly probably deserves to go feet first into a wood chipper. yet you feel the need to defend him, and his actions and advocate for him to be in a position of power over children. Thus enabling a pedophile.
But you do want pedophiles around our kids.
But that is not true here. He had child porn on his computer. Just because the DA couldn't "prove" the kids were under 18 doesn't make it any less disgusting. Or dangerous. Like Justice Stewart said when asked to define "obscene" -- I know it when I see it.
The fact that he had that stuff on his computer is enough for me. Just because someone couldn't identify and find birthdates for the young men in the pictures/videos doesn't absolve him. He HAD THE **** ON HIS COMPUTER.
I worked for a short while for an attorney who defended sex offenders. In the 18 months I worked for him not a single solitary man who came to him who had been charged with offenses against minors was innocent. Not A SINGLE ONE. And every one of them TO THE MAN said the children "asked" them to show them how to have sex!
I will never understand people who think that because someone got off on a technicality that means they are innocent. NOTHING could be further from the truth.
- Status
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Tornado/storm damage areas: Oklahoma AG enacts price gouging law for 12 counties
- Latest: OK Corgi Rancher
-
-
-
-
-
-
