In OK? Really?

[caliberbob]

I don’t know what porn was on his computer. I know charges were dropped so it must not have been child porn. It could have been barely legal teenagers (18-19 year old) like a few folks watch (I prefer MILFs, but that’s just me getting older). Whatever he had wasn’t found to be illegal. Again, if it was then **** him and may god have mercy on his soul.

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/08/29...rafficking-case-dismissed-due-to-suicide.html
Here you go friend. With your logic Jeffrey Epstein never trafficked children.

 

[HillsideDesolate]

That’s kinda how the law works. Otherwise you’re no better than the ATF and their “intent” definition for pistol braces, full auto components, or other situations they decide to apply to **** someone over.

Today I learned that not supporting pedophiles is the same as supporting the ATF. Makes perfect sense.

 

[HillsideDesolate]

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2019/08/29...rafficking-case-dismissed-due-to-suicide.html
Here you go friend. With your logic Jeffrey Epstein never trafficked children.

Yea Epstein never went to trial due to not killing himself so he is totally innocent.

 

[caliberbob]

It is the weirdest thing seeing grown men defend other grown men who dress in drag and insist on entertaining child education.

 

[JD8]

You can try and sweet talk me but it doesn’t make a difference to me. I just asked for proof he was a pedophile and nobody has been able to provide that. How that makes me “pat myself on the back for my tolerance and understanding” I don’t know. Why you felt the need to ramble about party line ideology is beyond my understanding and probably yours as well since you can’t just PROVIDE SOME ****ING PROOF he is a pedophile.

You can't provide proof that he's not. I mean, you can point to the court case, but you obviously haven't read what happened. Or you don't understand it. Either way.

 

[caliberbob]

You can't provide proof that he's not. I mean, you can point to the court case, but you obviously haven't read what happened. Or you don't understand it. Either way.

I mean believe me, i 100% agree with innocent until proven guilty. But evidence of child porn on his computer yet some technicality allowed him to walk? That’s BS. The man’s a pedo

 

[JD8]

I mean believe me, i 100% agree with innocent until proven guilty. But evidence of child porn on his computer yet some technicality allowed him to walk? That’s BS. The man’s a pedo

Let's forget the pedo charges for a moment. I'll say that someone who dances sexually on the weekends for show or money, gay, straight, wtf ever they are is not the best choice for a teacher or administrator of children. I don't care who people take to their bedroom, but your behavior outside of school should be an example.

 

[caliberbob]

Agreed. And like someone else mentioned earlier, why is it that these perverted drag queens always insist on reading to children? Oh right BECAUSE THEYRE PEDOs!!!!!!

 

[Buddhaman]

Today I learned that not supporting pedophiles is the same as supporting the ATF. Makes perfect sense.

Never said it was supporting the ATF, just that it doesn't make you any better than them. Quit twisting what I said.

 

[OHJEEZE]

I firmly believe every parent has a right and a duty to discriminate against any teacher based on what the teacher does inside (or) outside the classroom!