Record breaking tornado question

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

vvvvvvv

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Nov 18, 2008
Messages
12,284
Reaction score
65
Location
Nowhere
New record set 2.6 mile funnel. My question is is that measurement the top of the funnel where it joins the clouds or the bottom of the funnel where it is on the ground?

If that is the ground measurement, that is mind boggling to me.

On the ground. And it is not necessarily the condensation funnel, but the actual tornado itself. Many tornadoes have condensation funnels that never reach the ground while the tornado is on the ground.
 

waltham41

Sharpshooter
Joined
Jul 26, 2007
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
1
Location
Between Ft Gibson and Tahlequah on Hwy62
Wow..... talk about the hand of God..... Given the classical shape of a twister, then a 2.5 mile wide at the bottom twister is somewhere in the neighborhood of 5ish miles at the top, give or take.

Its truly amazing to me that more people are not hurt when one of these monsters rolls through.
 

Dale00

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
May 28, 2006
Messages
7,462
Reaction score
3,868
Location
Oklahoma
Wow..... talk about the hand of God..... Given the classical shape of a twister, then a 2.5 mile wide at the bottom twister is somewhere in the neighborhood of 5ish miles at the top, give or take.

Nope - wedge tornadoes are not that much wider at the top than on the ground.
 

mksmth

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 16, 2012
Messages
492
Reaction score
0
Location
bixby
I asked that in another thread but i got no answer.
From what i gathered on the WWW is that the measurement is estimated from how wide is was on Radar, which to me would include all the condensation bands/ Isnt that what radar is hitting is the rain/debris. There is no way the wind speeds were EF5 scale for 2.5 miles. I could be wrong though.

Travis Meyer has been very outspoken about how the NWS is basing the wind speeds and essentially the EF scale on winds several hundred feet about ground and thats wrong. I guess the actual ground speeds were lower than EF5. Thats doesnt make it any better but we do need to be sure they are measuring the part that is actually causing the damage.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom