For there beiong no WMD

[dennishoddy]

Its a proven fact that Saddam used chemical weapons against the Kurds in the North, and during the war with Iraq in 1988.

Why wouldn't he have them before our invasion? Why wouldn't he have time to ship them to Syria or bury them in the desert?

 

[Lurker66]

No this thread originated with real Iraqi WMD and evolved into a discussion about the Iraqi involvement in the attack on OKC. But you get extra points for that nice try at spin.

Also, anyone else remember the warnings about terrorist trying to recruit "Lilly whites" before the attack? Did anyone of you read the FBI report that Nicolas bomb making skills sucked until he went to the Philippines and met with one of the top Muslim bomb makers?

The book is BS along the lines of the DaVinci code. Yes she used some facts to spin a tale to sell a book. She has repeated said it's just her theory of what COULD have happened.

Christ.

 

[HMCS(FMF)Ret.]

Its a proven fact that Saddam used chemical weapons against the Kurds in the North, and during the war with Iraq in 1988.

Why wouldn't he have them before our invasion? Why wouldn't he have time to ship them to Syria or bury them in the desert?

I have no doubt he had chemical weapons. Chemical weapons in Iraq were not threat against the US. Heck if that was true we might as well blow up the whole world. ANYONE can make chemical weapons.

 

[jfssms]

My question is this, why does Obama want to reintroduce "combat" ground troops into the middle east?

 

[dennishoddy]

I have no doubt he had chemical weapons. Chemical weapons in Iraq were not threat against the US. Heck if that was true we might as well blow up the whole world. ANYONE can make chemical weapons.

Absolutely, but I get sick and tired of people saying that Saddam did not posess WMD when history proves he did.

 

[Hobbes]

Absolutely, but I get sick and tired of people saying that Saddam did not posess WMD when history proves he did.

And that s not why we went to war in 2003.
The claim was he had an active and ongoing nuclear and biological weapons production program.


Anthrax

 

[Lurker66]

Absolutely, but I get sick and tired of people saying that Saddam did not posess WMD when history proves he did.

And I get sick and tired of saying WMDs was a BS lie for the invasion of Iraq. Sure Iraq may HAVE HAD some, but that's not why we invaded them. And we didn't find any.

 

[jfssms]

Absolutely, but I get sick and tired of people saying that Saddam did not posess WMD when history proves he did.

These tools can not move on. The real question they won't answer is why this Potus has taken on a war time footing.

 

[dennishoddy]

And I get sick and tired of saying WMDs was a BS lie for the invasion of Iraq. Sure Iraq may HAVE HAD some, but that's not why we invaded them. And we didn't find any.

You know I have guns and ammo. I'll bet you by the time you drive here there won't be a sign of any weapons on the property, so whats your point?

 

[HMCS(FMF)Ret.]

Absolutely, but I get sick and tired of people saying that Saddam did not posess WMD when history proves he did.

To say Iraq had WMD was a way to convince the public that he was a threat to the US. So we could go bloody his nose. Could Iraq deploy chemical weapons to hurt the US. No. Plain and simple. The only way Iraq could have launched a chemical attack against the US, would have been to fly someone over with a can of Raid.