For there beiong no WMD

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Glocktogo

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
29,505
Reaction score
15,913
Location
Collinsville
No, no, no. The libs will only acknowledge nukes as WMD's. Chemical weapons do not qualify and if Huffpo doesn't say there were WMD's in Iraq, they didn't exist!
 

Hobbes

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
8,737
Reaction score
749
Location
The Nations
The desperation to revise history is strong enough to make the NY Times a reliable source.
Ironic indeed.
At the New York Times, Miller wrote on security issues, particularly about Iraq and weapons of mass destruction. Many of these stories later turned out to have been based upon faulty information. On September 7, 2002, Miller and fellow New York Times reporter Michael R. Gordon reported the interception of metal tubes bound for Iraq. Her front-page story quoted unnamed "American officials" and "American intelligence experts" who said the tubes were intended to be used to enrich nuclear material, and cited unnamed "Bush administration officials" who claimed that in recent months, Iraq "stepped up its quest for nuclear weapons and has embarked on a worldwide hunt for materials to make an atomic bomb".

"Mr. Hussein's dogged insistence on pursuing his nuclear ambitions, along with what defectors described in interviews as Iraq's push to improve and expand Baghdad's chemical and biological arsenals, have brought Iraq and the United States to the brink of war."

The claim was that Iraq had active ongoing weapons programs engaged in production of biological and nuclear weapons and that was proven false.

For more about the 30 year old leaking chemical shells read this.
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-dr...no-evidence-there-was-active-wmd-program-iraq
 

RickN

Eye Bleach Salesman
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Sep 7, 2009
Messages
25,516
Reaction score
34,494
Location
Edmond
Yall wanna be right so bad. Let it go. The war with Iraq is over. Iraq is gone. Sadam is gone.

ISIS is yalls new boogeyman.

That is the thing children, you are want to be right so bad that you sticking your head in the sand. 400 of them were sold to the US by one man. That is not a few forgotten in some dump. That is a stockpile warehoused somewhere. To make matters worse, if you read the story it mentions other programs that did not turn up as much. How many programs and how much did they come up with? Add this to what we already know about and as usual the liberals were wrong.

As far as the NYTs as the source, when a left wing mouthpiece like the NYTs admits something that contradicts a lefty talking point, you know there is more to come. They usually dribble out bad news in small doses so lefties heads do not explode.
 

Glocktogo

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 12, 2007
Messages
29,505
Reaction score
15,913
Location
Collinsville
That is the thing children, you are want to be right so bad that you sticking your head in the sand. 400 of them were sold to the US by one man. That is not a few forgotten in some dump. That is a stockpile warehoused somewhere. To make matters worse, if you read the story it mentions other programs that did not turn up as much. How many programs and how much did they come up with? Add this to what we already know about and as usual the liberals were wrong.

As far as the NYTs as the source, when a left wing mouthpiece like the NYTs admits something that contradicts a lefty talking point, you know there is more to come. They usually dribble out bad news in small doses so lefties heads do not explode.

See, I told you so! :rolleyes2
 

sh00ter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
4,577
Reaction score
3,176
Location
Twilight Zone
The weapons were there...he had a LONG time to get them out and he did it so we'd look stupid when none were found after we invaded. But then again, who are we to tell other governments what they can and can't have as long as they don't hurt us? Saddam didn't attack us, and all we did was remove a stable dictator who let women go to college & protected Christians; we paved the way for ISIS and removed the biggest offset to Iran...conservatives need to admit this...we have to learn from our mistakes...but we just keep doing it over and over like in Libya, etc...we're only hurting ourselves y'all...
 

sh00ter

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
4,577
Reaction score
3,176
Location
Twilight Zone
I keep bringing this up, and the lefties keep ignoring it, but if Saddam could bury close to 2 dozen fighter jets in the desert, how hard would it have been to hide WMD's?

American Forces Unearth Hidden Jets

well I'm no lefty and I do agree he had WMD's...I just don't agree with taking him out of power vs. the alternative we're now living with. Muslims do not want a republic...they have to find their own way and in the meantime, when they are ruled over by secular dictators, the world seems to be much safer. Mubarak, Saddam, Gaddafi, Assad, etc...wake up conservatives!
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom