Next court for apeal is SCOTUS right?
The libs want voting rights given to 16 year olds.If congress in their intuitive wisdom decided to make 18 year olds adults in 1965 (26th Amendment) how can they say that they cannot purchase a handgun? I feel the Amendment was to garner political votes but if an 18 year old can join the military and fight and die in some cases for this country then they should at least be able to purchase a pistol. I don't agree with what congress did because many 18 year olds are not adult enough or mature and make some stupid decisions which gives them a criminal record the rest of their lives. Before the change, they could make a dumb mistake and it would be considered as a juvenile I believe and expunged from their record once reaching the age of maturity at age 21.
Drinking isn't a right. Won't hold water. The real question is will any retailers be sued for refusing to sell handgun ammo to those under 21 now?This is gonna open up the drinking age argument now. Still, Glad about the decision.
Then the 86 ban needs overturned or repealed.We should also be allowed suppressors and full auto firearms
Next court for apeal is SCOTUS right?
I didnt say it is or isnt. Just said it will open u the argumentDrinking isn't a right. Won't hold water. The real question is will any retailers be sued for refusing to sell handgun ammo to those under 21 now?
That's always been my position. Make "adult" 18 or 21, but make it that age for EVERYTHING.If they're old enough to fight and die for our country, they should be allowed ALL the privileges they're defending, without exception.
Anything less is beyond hypocritical IMO.
Enter your email address to join: