>is a thread about several people upset with this business decision, a purely ethical oneThe only person that seems to believe it's complicated is you. It's pretty cut and dry if you eliminate the emotions out of it.
yes, until hyper stratification makes it where a few guys with all the money decide to buy all the things.I don’t know but it seems pretty simple to me. The market price of an item is what someone else is willing to pay for it.
Maybe, if I wanted it. You’re sounding like a proponent of socialism where the playing fieldyes, until hyper stratification makes it where a few guys with all the money decide to buy all the things.
would you like to buy some of that land that bill gates bought up?
and what if bill gates and ted turner aren't going to sell any of the entire states they own?Maybe, if I wanted it. You’re sounding like a proponent of socialism where the playing field
should be equalized.
Yes; I’m okay with your scenario. The price of an item is what someone else is willing to pay for it. A business won’t stay in business long if they don’t sell to the consumer.and what if bill gates and ted turner aren't going to sell any of the entire states they own?
i'm saying if someone *opens a business to sell a widget* then it's unethical to take widgets you have on the shelf marked a certain price off the shelf and just wait until the price may be more in your favor (especially when the chance of that happening is almost guaranteed).
otherwise be a 'collector' like the rest of us. what if all the gun stores just kept buying guns like they do now, but just stopped selling them? just because you know, guns will be worth more someday, right?
you're okay with wal-mart, bass pro, whoever, just stockpiling millions of firearms and sitting on them because i mean they have the money, space, and a business right?
You started this sh*t! How did you think a thread like this was going to go?!?
Enter your email address to join: