You are, simply, wrong. Not a little, not kind of, you are 100% wrong. Sorry, Skippy.
You are, simply, wrong. Not a little, not kind of, you are 100% wrong. Sorry, Skippy.
Now perhaps you can see how trivial you sound when you interject grammar into a thread. Gets everyone off topic, ruins a conversation and for what? That they're vs their and how it's used or its used in a sentence amuses you. It's annoying and trivial to the conversation.
Carry on with your/you're conversation. Sieg Heil.
Now perhaps you can see how trivial you sound when you interject grammar into a thread. Gets everyone off topic, ruins a conversation and for what? That they're vs their and how it's used or its used in a sentence amuses you. It's annoying and trivial to the conversation.
Carry on with your/you're conversation. Sieg Heil.
What a sad little man you are. Instead of admitting you made a mistake, you act like a jackass, "Oh, I just acted like an idiot to prove a point!" No one is buying it, Skippy.
You are loosing what little credibility you have on this site.
Interesting word choice.
It's the same BS you've pulled a 100 times. Now your/you're calling names. And yes Ace, I'll go a long ways to prove a point. Your/you're/ur an amateur and your forum tactics are very predictable. Join in any conversation but you should really knock of the trivial grammar thing.....
Do you correct Grammer or language errors in a cafe/diner barbershop???
That's simply not true. My posting history is available for anyone that cares. Before this thread, I did point out one other posters blatant mistake. And that was only because he made the classic "your an idiot" mistake. It's a moral imperative to point out that one.
Do you really want to get into who started the name calling? Yeah, I didn't think so.
No matter how wrong that point is it would appear.
Amateur? Forum tactics?
Once again, nothing to knock off.
I know you would like to paint me as a grammar Nazi, but to do so is simply as wrong as your mistaken definition of the word its.
I will admit to making a mistake. When you posted this:
"I come from the land of meat and potatoes and I've ate all over New York. Even had some of they're women. They're steak ain't all that. The steak at Dennys was better."
And I replied (which is what started the bifurcation of the thread):
"You've had some they are women? I've heard their they are women are hot! Never heard of a they are steak."
I was not correcting your grammar, I honestly thought you had just made a simple mistake, the kind we all make from time to time and I was, in an amusing way, pointing that out. Hell, I didn't even mention the "I've ate" mistake. I know now that you actually do not know the difference between their and they're. For that mistake, I apologize . I did not intend to make you feel bad.
I will now allow you the last word. Make it good.
Did I sound like this? Serious question.
Similar threads
