Haven't worn both, but have handled both. Researched both extensively before buying the MTAC. Likek it a lot.
I tried wormydog's crossbreed on tonight and it was great! Now I have my Kahr PM40 up for sale or trade so I can get an M&P40c. now the decision is Crossbreed or CompTac. I think that they will both feel the same, but I am not dead set on the M&P so if I bought the MTAC and decide on a different CCW option, I could just get a different shell. What do you guys think?
I was leaning to the comp tac, because of the changable shells(diff guns). They didnt make one for my gun.
So I got the CB. Very comfortabe, well made, fits my gun like a glove.
I will probably get a Comp tac to see the difference.
So I got the CB. Very comfortabe, well made, fits my gun like a glove.
I will probably get a Comp tac to see the difference.
What gun are you carrying in it?
+1
I prefer all kydex or all leather. Milt Sparks, Kramer, or the like for leather and Kytac, Raven Concealment Systems, Fist or the like for kydex.
I own both. Both are great for concealment. I carry a M&P 45 FS in mine and the only pro to the Comptac is that I don't have to buy an entire holster for another flavor of weapon. Just have to buy the kydex. I like the clips on the crossbreed better but are both very comfortable.
I have several Crossbreeds and LOVE them. Have not tried the MTAC, but it is probably really good as well.
Like many others, I have the proverbial "box of holsters" that are never used. Crossbreeds were the only ones I didn't find a reason not to carry.
I recently obtained a Milt Sparks SS2, and it may be my new favorite (and that is saying a LOT). However, it is not tuckable.
Like many others, I have the proverbial "box of holsters" that are never used. Crossbreeds were the only ones I didn't find a reason not to carry.
I recently obtained a Milt Sparks SS2, and it may be my new favorite (and that is saying a LOT). However, it is not tuckable.
Don't happen to have one for a 1911 that you need to get rid of?
