If the courts were really being honest about what a compelling government interest is, they would have to admit that the creation of new tax cattle is pretty damn vital to the continued viability of the coercive state.
You are welcome!
Do you really think that ONLY people of religious beliefs can be against same sex marriages? That only religion drives their rationale? More on the secular case against same sex marriage in a second.
Sorry My shot at being facetious went high. Some may like that their food tastes like richard or that it hurts to sit down.
I do not mean to disparage you but you are not speaking logically. They dont have to have a prejudice much less a religious-based reason to be against same sex marriages.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1082190/posts
Dude ... Don't take this too wrong but I have zero respect for you and your opinions to think that you should be the one that defines what is logical or illogical. AGAIN ... the point is that the author had a reason that was not based on religious beliefs.
Next time you are in one, why don't you ask? Just remember it's not polite to talk with your mouth full.
Actually, you can't prove his inherent bias one way or can you? His points aren't logical, well stated relative to most naysayers, but not logical.
If the courts were really being honest about what a compelling government interest is, they would have to admit that the creation of new tax cattle is pretty damn vital to the continued viability of the coercive state.
If I'd ever been in one, I'd assume I'd already know. In light of the considerable time you spend on the subject, I just assumed you already had the answer!
Now, back to the original question. How will gay marriage effect your life?
Enter your email address to join: