In OK? Really?

[HillsideDesolate]

You can try and sweet talk me but it doesn’t make a difference to me. I just asked for proof he was a pedophile and nobody has been able to provide that. How that makes me “pat myself on the back for my tolerance and understanding” I don’t know. Why you felt the need to ramble about party line ideology is beyond my understanding and probably yours as well since you can’t just PROVIDE SOME ****ING PROOF he is a pedophile.

Well, considering he is a degenerate homosexual that dedicated his life to getting close to children and has been caught with questionable pornographic materials. I guess we will just have to wait till he gets convicted of molesting a child before we can call him a pedophile...

 

[Buddhaman]

Well, considering he is a degenerate homosexual that dedicated his life to getting close to children and has been caught with questionable pornographic materials. I guess we will just have to wait till he gets convicted of molesting a child before we can call him a pedophile...

That’s kinda how the law works. Otherwise you’re no better than the ATF and their “intent” definition for pistol braces, full auto components, or other situations they decide to apply to **** someone over.

 

[turkeyrun]

He has images on laptop
He was charged with possession of child port

Judge dismissed because the participants couldn't be PROVEN to be underage.

Age doesn't matter! They APPEARED to be under age. He WANTED to be with under age boys.

He is a PEDO and has no business being around kids.

 

[okcBob]

You can try and sweet talk me but it doesn’t make a difference to me. I just asked for proof he was a pedophile and nobody has been able to provide that. How that makes me “pat myself on the back for my tolerance and understanding” I don’t know. Why you felt the need to ramble about party line ideology is beyond my understanding and probably yours as well since you can’t just PROVIDE SOME ****ING PROOF he is a pedophile.

So, are you denying there was NOT porn on his computer that had the appearance of minors? He admitted to the porn charges being dropped, so there was porn that the police thought contained minors.

 

[Buddhaman]

So, are you denying there was NOT porn on his computer that had the appearance of minors? He admitted to the porn charges being dropped, so there was porn that the police thought contained minors.

I don’t know what porn was on his computer. I know charges were dropped so it must not have been child porn. It could have been barely legal teenagers (18-19 year old) like a few folks watch (I prefer MILFs, but that’s just me getting older). Whatever he had wasn’t found to be illegal. Again, if it was then **** him and may god have mercy on his soul.

 

[HoLeChit]

(I prefer MILFs, but that’s just me getting older)

 

[okcBob]

I don’t know what porn was on his computer. I know charges were dropped so it must not have been child porn. It could have been barely legal teenagers (18-19 year old) like a few folks watch (I prefer MILFs, but that’s just me getting older). Whatever he had wasn’t found to be illegal. Again, if it was then **** him and may god have mercy on his soul.

Per news, the charges weren’t dropped & he wasn’t found innocent, as you claim. The judge dismissed the case but the judge was later overturned on appeal. This doesn’t mean “it must not have been child porn” & wasn’t found to be illegal. We don’t know what happened after the appeal because the case is now expunged. Did he cop a plea deal to get the case expunged? No one will ever know.

But the bigger picture here is we know for sure that he is a guy that does drag shows for children. At best, He’s attracted to adolescent looking boys (legal gay porn). You know, like his students. At worse, he had kiddie porn (per the prosecutors) but all records are expunged .
Apparently, nobody here thinks he should be working around children except you.

 

[HillsideDesolate]

Per news, the charges weren’t dropped & he wasn’t found innocent, as you claim. The judge dismissed the case but the judge was later overturned on appeal. This doesn’t mean “it must not have been child porn” & wasn’t found to be illegal. We don’t know what happened after the appeal because the case is now expunged. Did he cop a plea deal to get the case expunged? No one will ever know.

But the bigger picture here is we know for sure that he is a guy that does drag shows for children. At best, He’s attracted to adolescent looking boys (legal gay porn). You know, like his students. At worse, he had kiddie porn (per the prosecutors) but all records are expunged .
Apparently, nobody here thinks he should be working around children except you.

In cases such of this I believe the correct course of action to be trial by fire. If the drag queen is innocent then surely God will intercede and prevent him from burning.

 

[Adhdferret]

My children will never enter the public school system...

Your children will be forced to interact with people that did, so unless you give enough of a F to help change it....then it won't matter if they do or they don't, because public education ain't going away.

 

[conditionzero]

Your children will be forced to interact with people that did, so unless you give enough of a F to help change it....then it won't matter if they do or they don't, because public education ain't going away.

It will make an immense difference in the quality of my children's education. I give the most F's about that.