Oil Earthquakes confirmed

[1krr]

You know what I've noticed in this and most of the other threads? Oil supporters doing nothing more than saying, "Nope, ain't happening. Not us." Seen lots of, there isn't enough proof and there is no reason to believe the conclusions of the research. You know what I haven't seen? A single post offering a single bit of evidence that in any way says oil/gas activity isn't at fault. It's easy to sit on the sidelines and poopoo things as long as we all still getting paid. And they wonder why people don't trust them.

 

[Hobbes]

There's a remedy for that and it does not have to be government. Ever heard of OERB? Something similar would work just fine.

ETA: That mag 7 that they are predicting. Where is any evidence whatsoever other than the tripe they spew forth. They actually have some correlation on these small pipsqueak ones. But they are just pulling these mag 7 probabilities out of their ass.

I guess in a way you just admitted that the injection wells are likely the cause of the earthquakes when you assigned the task of repairing the damage to the OERB.

 

[Shadowrider]

OERB? Really. That's like asking the Nazi's with help building a synagog. Tell you what. Get big government of property rights, and I'll not ask big government to keep you from causing earthquakes. Deal?

I said:

"something like OERB"

Either you have no idea what OERB has done for the state overall and how it's funded or you have jumped neck deep into the trolling with Huntersworld.

Y'all have fun...

 

[Shadowrider]

I guess in a way you just admitted that the injection wells are likely the cause of the earthquakes when you assigned the task of repairing the damage to the OERB.

Lets review:

Posted by SMS and paraphrased. "Correlation does not equal causation".

Later.... I gots to go steal someone's mineral rights.

 

[Hobbes]

Lets review:

Posted by SMS and paraphrased. "Correlation does not equal causation except in the Hillary Clinton thread where correlation and causation are dam near the same thing".

Fixed it for ya...

 

[CHenry]

OK I'm back. Who pissing the furthest now?

 

[1krr]

Me. But I have a length advantage so it's not really fair.

 

[CHenry]

Me. But I have a length advantage so it's not really fair.

I thought you were pivot man in this circle jerk.

 

[1krr]

I thought you were pivot man in this circle jerk.

I don't know anything about circle jerking so I'll have to take your word for it!

 

[dennishoddy]

Oh and let's talk about Round up. Recently a study showed that it could cause cancer. Wouldn't you have liked to know that before you sprayed it all over the place? How much roundup puts you at risk? Do you know???? wouldn't you like to know????
QUOTE]

It only took a second to look up if Roundup, aka Glyphosate causes cancer in Humans. No it does not. Here is a list of peer reviewed studies and how did them:

By: David Saltmiras, Science Fellow, Toxicology Manager of the Novel Chemistry and Microbials Product Platform, Monsanto Company on Thursday, 5/15/2014 5:16 pm



No, glyphosate does not cause cancer. But don’t just take my word for it. Please also consider statements from multiple authorities who reviewed both robust glyphosate data sets and peer-reviewed literature, quoted below. Over the last 25 years or more, these expert reviewers have not wavered from the science-based conclusion that glyphosate does not cause cancer. What I find quite compelling is that over the years, the volume of toxicology studies on glyphosate has grown considerably and has increased confidence in the repeated scientific conclusions on this topic. Between 1981 and 2009, glyphosate was tested in at least thirteen long-term/carcinogenicity studies, eight in rats and five in mice, all of which were evaluated by independent experts, who all concluded that glyphosate does not cause cancer.



World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (WHO/FAO JMPR, 1987):

“The chronic toxicity of glyphosate is low; the only significant toxicity seen in a number of animal bioassays was mild hepatotoxicity at high doses in mice. There is no evidence of carcinogenicity.”



Canadian Pest Management Regulatory Agency (1991):

“Health and Welfare Canada has reviewed the glyphosate toxicology database, which is considered to be complete. The acute toxicity of glyphosate is very low. The submitted studies contain no evidence that glyphosate causes mutations, birth defects or cancer.”



US Environmental Protection Agency, Registration Eligibility Document (US EPA, 1993):

“Based on the results of its reregistration review, EPA has concluded that all registered uses of glyphosate are eligible for reregistration. The Agency has classified glyphosate as a Group E carcinogen (signifies evidence of noncarcinogenicity in humans).”



World Health Organization International Programme on Chemical Safety, Environmental Health Criteria 159 (WHO IPCS, 1994):

“Animal studies show that glyphosate is not carcinogenic, mutagenic or teratogenic.”



World Health Organization/Food and Agriculture Organization Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues (WHO/FAO JMPR, 2004)

“In view of the absence of a carcinogenic potential in animals and the lack of genotoxicity in standard tests, the Meeting concluded that glyphosate is unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk to humans.”



Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (APVMA, 2013) review of the Earth Open Source report “Roundup and Birth Defects: Is the Public Being Kept in the Dark?”

“The APVMA currently has no data before it suggesting that glyphosate products registered in Australia and used according to label instructions present any unacceptable risks to human health, the environment and trade …”

“The weight and strength of evidence shows that glyphosate is not genotoxic, carcinogenic or neurotoxic. “



Glyphosate Reevaluation Assessment Report, Germany Rapporteur Member State for the European Annex I Renewal of Glyphosate (2014)

“…glyphosate was considered unlikely to pose a carcinogenic risk in humans …”



“In epidemiological studies in humans, there was no evidence of carcinogencity and there were no effects on fertility, reproduction and development or of neurotoxicity that might be attributed to glyphosate. “