Stainless or Blued Magazines?

[Honeybee]

Blaze orange and they won't get lost!

 

[Glock 'em down]

Blued is purdier.

Stainless is tuffer.

If it were me, I'd go stainless.

 

[aeropb]

I've got this idea that anything that I can buy in stainless I'm going to buy in stainless from now on. Kinda makes sense for corrosion protection.

 

[Beretta4653]

I have a 92 fs in ss but the mag is blue. I don't know if they make ss for the beretta.

 

[Beretta4653]

Does anyone know bout the sig 220 combat?

 

[Woodcutter]

If I have a choice, I always go stainless. In this Oklahoma humidity, blued steel even rusts inside an air-conditioned house if you do not keep it oiled up.

To me, whatever works best and is the longest lasting wins out over looks, so I see no advantage to blued steel.

 

[JR0306]

I always thought that the durability and less likely rust developing on stainless was a good quality. In the heat of the summer I always sweat and have to keep them oiled and wiped down.

 

[Traxxis]

Does anyone know bout the sig 220 combat?

What do you want to know about it?

 

[Nightops]

As others have said, blued is more subject to corrosion and finish wear. Either will work, given that you are willing to provide the level of care they require. Stainless just require less maintenance.

 

[Buddhaman]

Guess I'll go with stainless. It's only about $5 per magazine in difference, which isn't too bad compared to the price of other magazines out there. Thanks guys!