Stanford Scientist Says Man "Has No Free Will" ...

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

rhart

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
1,078
Reaction score
3,237
Location
Tulsa Oklahoma
I couldn't read the article (paywall), but I've seen his stuff on Youtube in the past and I can't imagine it's changed much. I agree with him to a point. But I believe our environmental upbringing provides us with a range of responses to any given situation from which we can choose one (or more) to utilize in the moment when needed.
 

rhart

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 3, 2011
Messages
1,078
Reaction score
3,237
Location
Tulsa Oklahoma
"...it is a mistake to equate science with reductionism. Science does not force us to think of humans as nothing more than heaps of interacting particles. To the contrary, in the sciences of human behavior—from anthropology and psychology to economics and sociology—it is standard practice to think of people as intentional agents with a capacity for making choices and responding intelligently to their environments." Boston Review

https://www.bostonreview.net/articl...ter all.,than heaps of interacting particles.
 

mtnboomr

Questionable Character
Special Hen
Joined
Jan 25, 2023
Messages
1,093
Reaction score
1,853
Location
MWC, OK
1697743821094.png
 

caliberbob

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 12, 2023
Messages
2,335
Reaction score
6,337
Location
NE Oklahoma
“After more than 40 years studying humans and other primates, Sapolsky has reached the conclusion. . .”

He’s implying we are a form of primate. I’m sorry, I’m not a primate nor is there any relation to a primate. We are however created in God’s image. “Professors” like this guy are all talk and no brains.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom