I will concede that if the topic is about the age of the Earth, perhaps a politician isn't the right guy to expect a good answer from.
So while one can spin or muddy up the water, do we really care what any politician thinks about the age of the earth?
I see the article as something that steers a voter away from real issues into the realm of partisan propaganda.
Much like Hillarys email or Benghazi, this article is not a "big deal" except to the haters.
Apples to oranges. One is about the candidate's personal beliefs about a subject which is completely unrelated to the good governance of the nation, while the other has a direct correlation to the candidate's efficacy of running the nation. Sorry, not apples to oranges, more like kumquats to platypusses.
Back on topic, I can't wrap my mind around "Why not Rubio?", because I'm too busy trying to wrap my mind around "Why not Kasich?"???