Apples to oranges. One is about the candidate's personal beliefs about a subject which is completely unrelated to the good governance of the nation, while the other has a direct correlation to the candidate's efficacy of running the nation. Sorry, not apples to oranges, more like kumquats to platypusses. Back on topic, I can't wrap my mind around "Why not Rubio?", because I'm too busy trying to wrap my mind around "Why not Kasich?"???