Pelosi Violates The Constitution And Shows Her True Dictatorial Tyranny

[SoonerP226]

Looks like Der Fuhrer Biden is joining in with the dictates as well.:

https://www.theblaze.com/news/presi...ederal-workers-must-submit-to-vaccine-testing
I guess we ought to just fall in line just like all peoples who have been conquered. We are being ruled in that fashion, aren't we?

Woody

Not sure what the problem is here. The President is the boss of the Executive Branch, so he pretty much gets to set the rules for its employees. It has been that way since ol' GW was in charge.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

I don't know. I'm just answering the question about why they'd be referred to the Sergeant at Arms.

That I understand. But what rule is the question, and how did it come about is what I'd like to know. If anyone knows how this rule came about, please post it here. Near as I can tell, it came from Her Royal Majesty Nancy P.

Woody

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

Not sure what the problem is here. The President is the boss of the Executive Branch, so he pretty much gets to set the rules for its employees. It has been that way since ol' GW was in charge.

Such rules are usually proposed by the bureaucrats, opened for public comment for a time and then submitted to Congress for approval or rejection. The President's job is to enforce those rules, not make them up.

Woody

 

[SoonerP226]

Such rules are usually proposed by the bureaucrats, opened for public comment for a time and then submitted to Congress for approval or rejection. The President's job is to enforce those rules, not make them up.

That's only for public-facing rules. The President can make up and change the rules for Federal employees at any time (within the bounds set by acts of Congress). I'm pretty sure you'll find that Trump changed the rules for Federal employees during his tenure, as did almost all of his predecessors.

 

[ConstitutionCowboy]

That's only for public-facing rules. The President can make up and change the rules for Federal employees at any time (within the bounds set by acts of Congress). I'm pretty sure you'll find that Trump changed the rules for Federal employees during his tenure, as did almost all of his predecessors.

Within the bounds set by Congress. Ergo, no supposedly autonomous dictates. I wonder what bounds set by Congress are actually constitutional ...

Woody

 

[ForsakenConservative]

When no body holds them accountable, when they're never investigated, when something pops up that doesn't favor them and the media suppresses it, this is what we get. Over and over and over, decade after decade.

Welcome to mob rule. A recent White House occupant loved to demand we all have skin in the game-he was a jackass, but on this he had a point. Mob rules is what happens when the majority of voters have no skin in the game. If you’re curious where we’re headed, look at South Africa.

 

[SoonerP226]

Within the bounds set by Congress. Ergo, no supposedly autonomous dictates. I wonder what bounds set by Congress are actually constitutional ...

Not bounds set by Congress--bounds set by acts of Congress, which would be statutes passed by Congress and signed into law by the President (with the exception of overridden vetoes).

Now, how many of those acts are actually constitutional is another question entirely.

 

[Hodrod]

18 months until the midterm elections change everything........can't come fast enough

 

[Slim Deal]

None of this is going to end well.

 

[DavidMcmillan]

None of this is going to end well.

Oh, I think it is going to end very well. Listen to the voices of the everyday people. The Left has overplayed their hand, and they continue to do so. Midterms are going to be fun to watch.