Until some self righteous douche does something to someone's family?
He should be audited.
So a disabled vet, his new 20 year old wife and 16 year old daughter go into a bar.
The vet orders 3 beers.
So your saying the waitress shouldn't ID the group? only the guy who ordered the beers?
The vet orders 3 beers.
So your saying the waitress shouldn't ID the group? only the guy who ordered the beers?
Huh??
The guy clearly has issues, but I have to pick on one point made by The Barracks in their statement.
They said:
"He had NOT served in a combat zone, making his service-related claim a lie. We do not support any Veteran who lies or exaggerates their Veteran status for their personal gain. It is disrespectful to our Brothers and Sisters who have given the ultimate sacrifice to allow any Veteran to claim they have served in combat."
Now, I don't know exactly what this guy claimed to be, but one does not have to have sustained injury in a combat zone to be rated with a service connected or related disability. So he could have an official service connected condition. The VA hands those out like candy.
If he is claiming to be a combat wounded vet or something to that effect, then he is an even bigger POS.
They said:
"He had NOT served in a combat zone, making his service-related claim a lie. We do not support any Veteran who lies or exaggerates their Veteran status for their personal gain. It is disrespectful to our Brothers and Sisters who have given the ultimate sacrifice to allow any Veteran to claim they have served in combat."
Now, I don't know exactly what this guy claimed to be, but one does not have to have sustained injury in a combat zone to be rated with a service connected or related disability. So he could have an official service connected condition. The VA hands those out like candy.
If he is claiming to be a combat wounded vet or something to that effect, then he is an even bigger POS.
I think he’s trying to compare that hypothetical to the Walmart policy, supporting Walmart IDing all members of a party purchasing alcohol.
It’s not really an honest or accurate comparison though given Walmart doesn’t serve alcohol for consumption on premises like a bar does.
1) What are a 16-year-old and a 20-year-old doing in a bar in the first place?
2) It's illegal (in Oklahoma) to serve anybody more than two drinks at a time, so in order to bring three, she'd have to confirm that at least one of the other two is of age.
However, this wasn't a bar (on-premises consumption); this was a closed package for off-premises consumption. In fact, it's illegal for Wal*Mart to allow on-premises consumption, so liability for the minor(s) drinking elsewhere would devolve onto the person actually furnishing the alcohol: the retail buyer, not Wal*Mart. Big difference.
Still waiting on the Jason Williams supporters to present a full length video of his interaction with the clerk prior to the police being called. I'm quite certain we'll never see it. It doesn't support the narrative.
Wait... is this why a "double" is the biggest damned drink I can ever get? No one will ever serve me a triple. A double is like a farging joke! It's an aperitif!
Similar threads
