I know. Its hard to know who would have been worse for 2A. With insane mccain, the RINOs would have passed "common sense gun legislation" like "closing the gun show loop hole" a long time ago, and registration would be the law of the land.
With the Bamster, at least the RINOs "united" against the common enemy, and haven't passed anything yet.
You may be right though, because IMHO, Obamacare is the greatest threat long-term to our liberties because of information collection and creation of databases, plus the linking of any kind of social engineering to "scientific studies on healthcare". For example, CDC studies on guns as a health hazard.
There's no question that Obama would have been far worse for gun owners than McCain.
Their voting record proved it at the time of theelection.
McCain may have been a C or C+ at the time, but Obama was a solid F.
Also bear in mind that McCain wouldn't have appointed Eric Holder as his attorney general.
His VP was Sarah Palin, who is a staunch gun rights supporter.
Have you all already forgotten how much of an anti-gun stance Joe Biden took?
The GOP would not have allowed McCain to be a gun grabber such as Obama, as it would drive away a huge voter base away from the Republican Party.