The language of violence

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

MadDogs

Sharpshooter
Joined
Mar 2, 2010
Messages
2,960
Reaction score
631
Location
Edmond, OK
I should also add that i'm of the mind (as of right now) that it can be about many things.

I don't really want to think that a person who kills 9 people like this is mentally stable, but i'm also not willing to dismiss that he could just have been a hateful racist, either.

Obviously in the world of media and politics, each side will use whichever words further the narrative desired, which is why i think it's hard to actually see a positive change come from these things.

How about a hateful racist that was mentally ill? Covers all the bases.
 

RidgeHunter

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
9,674
Reaction score
723
Location
OK
I don't really want to think that a person who kills 9 people like this is mentally stable

Why not? Killing each other is one of the things people do best. Were the Nazis all mentally ill? What about hundreds of thousands of young Hutus in 1994? All the gang shooters to ever bust off a shot in Roseland on a summer weekend?

Mentally stable people are full 100% capable of killing people. I'm capable of killing people. ****, many members of this forum have killed people. Well, not without a reason you say. Reasoning is subjective. Good reason, bad reason, whatever. All we need is a reason. The same guy on the sidewalk walking by my house at 4:00 pm would be bleeding out on my hardwoods if I found him in my bedroom at 4:00 am. There's my reason. Mop top's reason for shooting up a church? Not as good, right? That's my opinion. Still the same act. Killing other people. I'm just as capable of it as he is.

The mentally ill are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators of it. I get real tired of every person that commits a violent act being pawned off as "crazy". This kid was an outcast loser who, for whatever reason, decided to subscribe to white supremacy to make himself feel better and more in control and give his daily life a sense of meaning. He used the capacity for violence we all have in a way that is contrary to the type of society we should be working to build.*

"How could a person be capable of such violence" cracks me up. We're a disgusting animal. Maybe "mental illness" is our default state. Somewhere right now some dude is raping a baby and we sit around talking about morals. We are an evolutionary mistake. We congealed in the primordial soup a bit too long and this is what happened.

Morality is subjective and flexible and easily overruled by something as seemingly silly as fake authority. Stanley Millgram, Yale University, 1961. We know right from wrong, but that's not what governs most of us. Social norms do. If everyone else has a machete or a can of Zyklon B, we pick one up too, even if we feel bad about it. This is proven.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocides_in_history

*Now with our big brains and our luxury of not having to work to eat 24/7, we can attempt to develop a society that's a bit kinder and gentler to our fellow man. It's proving to be a little tough, though. Feels unnatural and scary to many.

Race superiority. Separatists and supremacists and gang members - they all are trying to fill something inside of with something easier than introspection and personal evolution. A life in prison is easier than coming to grips with your own failures and shortcomings.

Mental illness is real and the mentally ill do commit violent crimes. But you don't have to be crazy to murder. In fact most murderers are just like you and me. I sat in on a first degree murder trail. Dude shot his wife 7 times one morning before breakfast. Nice, polite, normal suburban dude. Sane. Just decided one day he'd like to see his wife with some extra holes in her. Was he crazy? Nope. We come hardwired for violence. We're mammals, with too much time on our hands, and brains that doubled in size in a remarkably short time for no ******* good reason. Cognitive dissonance is us and we are it. Locked in eternal battle. Id, ego, superego, superheros, superhighways, drugs, planes, trains, automobiles, is anyone still reading this ****? I've seen people beat each other's teeth out for reasons they couldn't articulate for a million dollars. We're f*cking chimps, man. Shaved chimps with mortgages and .45s.
 
Last edited:

RidgeHunter

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
9,674
Reaction score
723
Location
OK
We all have the capacity to do f*cked up ****. How many of us have ever had the urge to just haul off and beat the crap out of someone? Dumbass uncle at Thanksgiving, rude guy in line at the bank, guy who cut you off in traffic? Who among us hasn't felt real, burning anger? Ever been in a heated fight with a girlfriend or wife and had a flash of a violent thought you'd never act on? Ever been cheated on and felt anger over that? What the fawk kind of primal, socially-fueled emotion is that? Lotta people been killed over affairs in the last 100 years in America. People touching other people in a way we invented contracts to prohibit. Results in murder. A lot more people have taken a step back, thought about things for a minute, let that emotion cool off and gotten on with their lives without violence.

We all have violent thoughts and urges and we all feel insecure. If you don't, you're a liar or an alien. You have two choices when a f*cked up thought comes into your head: own it, think about it, acknowledge that it is likely a result of something like your own personal insecurities. Evolve. Move on. Grow. Be a better person. Become more comfortable with your insecurities and stop being as defensive. Change what you don't like about yourself. Embarrassment be damned.

Or you stoke it. You stoke that fire. Outcast? Downtrodden? Poor? Ugly? Social skills lacking? Assign that unsettling feeling to something that in no way caused it. Black people, maybe. Find other people who have done the same. Find powerful groups and organizations and intellectuals who have written books about the subject. South Africa, Rhodesia, 3rd Reich. Feel a part of something. Convince yourself that people that you probably have little to no interaction with have ruined your life, your country, your peers. That's why you don't fit in. You never had a chance. They ruined it for you. Take back what's yours. Feel your new found power. Become deluded with it. Murder. Crazy? No. Sad, disgusting, and reprehensible? Yup. But sad is our milieu.

Our brains are supercars and most of us can't handle them. Into the wall we go.
 

mugsy

Sharpshooter
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
4,538
Reaction score
1,112
Location
South West, OK
Thanks for the definitions. I just think it's interesting that one side wants to talk about yesterday as being about mental illness and not as racism. Yet, not much discussion of the act as being about race. And i can't help but feel that we'd want to distinguish it yet again as a terrorist act if it was more based on religion.

I perhaps am not being as clear as i could be (as i am wrestling with it all in my head). Maybe it's simply searching for reason for something that has none.

Why are you particularly struck by the shooters motive? Motive is important for proving intent in court but beyond that why? I see this as a crime of murder and perhaps terrorism because he wished (shooters own words to police) to start a race war with another Zimmerman-like incident. But his crime isn't evil, wrong or bad thinking, it was the act of committing the murder of nine people. To use your words "one side", of which my many very Liberal friends from where I grew up and went to school (New York City) are a part, see it as very important to stress the racism even over the murder because it feeds a narrative they already believe. Namely, that the large mass of white, rural, Christian, Southern or Western, with perhaps an exception for Colorado, are arming up to commit atrocities because of lax US gun laws.

I do think it was an error for Fox News to initially push the "maybe this was anti-Christian" line. Why engage in such speculation? Simply wait until some facts are known - there was no need to speculate, it just makes things worse and since it turned out to be wrong in this case it also makes Fox look foolish. We've seen many instances of Liberal attribution of crimes to racism that turned out later to be incorrect (they usually get a page 15 retraction) like with the famously mis-reported "racist" Church burnings. However, here the Liberal boogeyman was real. It is what they needed(I am NOT saying wanted) to press hard for laws to disarm those who have committed no crime under the Logic that all non-Liberal North Eastern or large urban area dwellers are basically the same racist powder kegs waiting to explode. Did I weigh-in enough for starters?
 

druryj

In Remembrance / Dec 27 2021
Supporting Member
Special Hen Supporter
Joined
Jan 16, 2010
Messages
21,469
Reaction score
17,724
Location
Yukon, OK
I've been thinking about this for the past 24 hours and i'm curious to hear some opinions.

First thing, though, this topic will touch upon race but no racism (veiled or otherwise) will be tolerated. Second, keep the rhetoric to yourself. Honest opinions are welcome, but inflammatory posting on either side will shut this down fast. I haven't had the chance to lock any threads yet, so don't think i wont hesitate to shut this one down.

Maybe i'm naive to think that we can have a rational discussion of these things on OSA, but we shall see.

So, my question is in regards to the language we use to discuss violence like we saw yesterday. It's obvious that each side stakes out buzzwords and language that either promote or minimize an issue whenever something like this occurs.

When several people are shot, such as happened yesterday, there is lots of talk of 'mental illness' from one side and 'racism' on the other. Yet when the same number of people are killed in other places, it's often written off a 'gang violence' instead of a 'mass shooting'.

If religion is involved somehow then things change more, with 'mental illness' and 'racism' often being traded for 'terrorism'.

So, how do you decide in your own mind which words to use to describe something like this? Can these things be a combination of things? Are people not capable of seeing these issues as being more complex than just being made up of one or two problems?

Finally, i know it is easy to make the media the scapegoat for these things, but lets be honest, we all parrot the words. Simply writing something off as a larger 'agenda' seems too easy. I want to know how you sort these things out for yourself (media and politics aside).

I'm just confused ... Are you just trying to be a "Top Mod" or something by threatening to close the thread? What's with the negative attitude?


Sent from my iPhone
 

SM Rider

Sharpshooter
Joined
Dec 18, 2014
Messages
206
Reaction score
0
Location
Reality
Why did the fictional character Cain kills his brother? Like any moral deficiency, it seems some people consider themselves above moral rules established by Nature's designer.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom