I agree with some of the comments that teachers shouldn't be on strike, or constantly complaining. However, they aren't "constantly" complaining. What would you do, if your salary stayed the same year after year, class sizes continued to increase, additional duties were assigned because of unruly students, additional reporting requirements because of actions by legislators, having to be the "guards" during recess, and then the talk is that they should be armed? The state legislature only responds when they hear enough loud voices. Walking out when school or the legislative body is not in session is nothing more than mental masterbation.
And what would you base merit pay on? Standardized testing? That's already been proven to be faulty. A teacher has a student for nine months, and has no impact on previous years. Testing takes place in a classroom with typical students, students with one or more parents in prison, students that do not speak English, students that are being abused at home, and students that don't have enough to eat. Would you want your raise based on that?
And what would you base merit pay on? Standardized testing? That's already been proven to be faulty. A teacher has a student for nine months, and has no impact on previous years. Testing takes place in a classroom with typical students, students with one or more parents in prison, students that do not speak English, students that are being abused at home, and students that don't have enough to eat. Would you want your raise based on that?