what were you saying then? by the way, the insult does not make you correct. you can feel free to no longer reply to any of my posts, I do not care for you anyway.
Last edited:
go in a school, you would be amazed.
sadly, it is not surprising the number mothers you will see with the newest cell phone, when their child does not have internet in their home for homework.
I said that an advantage of feeding the kids directly is that the parents can't turn the food stamps into booze and smokes. Not a word about "feed[ing] every kid in the nation for free." Strictly speaking, I didn't even advocate for feeding the kids at all, just said that it has a benefit over giving food stamps to the parents (though, even with my strong libertarian sensibilities, I do find myself sympathetic to the idea of feeding the kids on an as-needed basis...and if it's truly needed, they won't turn their noses up at much).
I think feeding sites are a better idea than food stamps, anyway. However, food stamps are a welfare program for farmers.
every child in Lawton gets a free hot breakfast, if that is what you want to call it. we even have a food locker to send food home over the weekend, a student just has go by and pick up a backpack with food in it. if a child does not have any money they can always get a cheese sandwich, fruit, and milk. I am not sure what else we do for a child.
no, although I am replying to one now.
Dont you have some kids playing in your street making noise you need to go yell at?
Your an idiot.
better than being a liberal
Whoever said that? Not me. I was merely talking about student behavior as it is today and reasons why. Some are hungry.
And you take that to mean I want a new liberal welfare program for those kids? Your reading way to much into my post dude. Put the crack pipe down and back away.
So we should subsidize these household with free internet. Frickin liberal idiot
Similar threads
