Oh yeah, check Song of Solomon. Chapter 2 verse 3 describes a woman giving a man oral, and in several places it alludes to a man giving a woman oral. God made sex to be fun.
Oh yeah, check Song of Solomon. Chapter 2 verse 3 describes a woman giving a man oral, and in several places it alludes to a man giving a woman oral. God made sex to be fun.
This is true, the term "sodomy" , from the city Sodom - refers to unnatural acts. Since the story in the Bible specifically referred to homosexual activity, that's how it has been used. Some may decide anything other than doggystyle is unnatural, while others may think as long as it's two married folks, anything goes. Since biblically it refers to homosexuality, I'm of the mind that anything goes as long as it's between man and wife.
I'm sorry you have such little knowledge on the subject, Ridge, it'll come in due time, I'm sure of it.
My immaturity got the best of me and ^^^ has me crackin up.
So says the mayor of Brokeback Mountain who wants to chat and hear stories about sodomy.
Well said.
...and now the sodomy experts arrive...
Why Willy Loman, I thought you had a new screenname by now. Hadn't seen ya 'round these parts in a good while.
If a man is standing, and a woman is "sitting in his shade" where is his "fruit" that she can taste it?
Some also say Sodom & Gomorrah fell from other sins, not homosexuality specifically. There was lots of wrong livin' goin' on there and then.
We had another thread that was talking about the legal definition of sodomy, which in many states covers acts a married, straight, church going Christian couple might commonly perform in 2015. Now 70 years ago they might not have been so popular in that crowd. You'd likely be a deviant in the Oklahoma of that era, with your "anything goes" lifestyle. The only oral that likely ever went down among folks of my grandparent's generation and peer group was overseas in the early 40s - you sure didn't expect your wife to debase herself like that. And she sure wouldn't expect you to...do that to her.
Don't feel that bad, Ted. I'm a born-again virgin, since right before I started this thread. It's the best of both worlds, really. I'm just practicing in case I ever enter the political arena.
I'm hoping I can go back to the other side later today (this side is just as boring as I remember), but I've been really annoying the other half lately, so I might be out of luck.
If that's true, what's so wrong with bending to the will of a couple hippie chicks in a tent at a music festival? It ain't trying to forcibly gangbang male angels like in the Genesis 19, right? Nor harm, no foul (definitely no fowl - that I know is wrong)?
I always thought it was pretty messed up that Lot was all like, here, gangrape my daughters - please I beg of you, gangrape my virgin daughters! Like, geeze, dad. Thanks.
