Results of my linguistic, author-identification analyses are in. This one isn't a surprise, but is still hilarious.
Data are most useful when shared. Who do you think it is?
Results of my linguistic, author-identification analyses are in. This one isn't a surprise, but is still hilarious.
Why don't you simply put him on "ignore" if you don't want to read it?
If you see something that violates forum rules, report it and we'll take care of it. Other than that, don't feed the troll if you don't want to reinforce him. Or, put him on 'ignore' if that's what you prefer. Or, have fun with it, if that's what you prefer. It's all good.So … it is OK for someone to post a comment about killing members of a religion as he did about Muslims? You even questioned him about that.
It is OK for someone to rant about shooting people who are “prone” in his front yard wearing “helmets”? Since you (again) need help with the math, allow me to share yet another “teaching moment” with you. If one is in the US and they are shooting at people who have gone “prone” and who happen to be wearing helmets, do you think he is talking about your gay biker friends or LEOs?
All the faux gun crap he tries to sell as "knowledge" can and should be ignored. But that is not the point. The point is allowing delusional twits to post bigoted comments or make inferences to having to defend one’s home from LEOs or making comments about shooting people of any religion is south of bat guano crazy and that truly denigrates this forum.
Thank youWe have solved the problem. For those of you who want to keep up with the threads started by okeydoke, they're all being moved to the Stupid Stuff forum. Enjoy.