And I believe this applies to several instances lately where that label is being thrown around..... IMO.
It's because one sided and wildly lopsided aren't interchangeable, but some people can't differentiate.
And I believe this applies to several instances lately where that label is being thrown around..... IMO.
you’re correct, my mistake.It's not strawman, that's a rhetorical statement and I never changed the parameters of what I'm speaking about.
who geraniums mad? This is the Internet lol.It’s just fun to pass time between appointments.You just got mad because your ho-hum response was BS.
Exactly my point, just approached from the other side lolIt's because one sided and wildly lopsided aren't interchangeable, but some people can't differentiate.
This show will bomb. Roassanne was one of the main reasons that show was good. Without her it won’t survive. Her and “Jackie’s” exchanges were hilarious. I wish Fox would pick up roassane and revamp it in there."Roseanne" has now been revamped as a new showed called the Conners..without Roseanne.
https://www.theguardian.com/culture...nne-spinoff-the-connors-without-roseanne-barr
This show will bomb. Roassanne was one of the main reasons that show was good. Without her it won’t survive. Her and “Jackie’s” exchanges were hilarious. I wish Fox would pick up roassane and revamp it in there.
It's going to be interesting to see how they write her out of the script.
Enter your email address to join: