1. Welcome to Oklahoma Shooters Association! Join today, registration is easy!

    You can register using your Google, Facebook, or Twitter account, just click here.

Who is More Supportive of Science?

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by TerryMiller, Feb 8, 2019.

  1. TerryMiller

    TerryMiller Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    7,482
    Likes Received:
    2,444
    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2009
    Location:
    Here, but occasionally There.
    Liberals or conservatives?

     
  2. emapples

    emapples Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    2,420
    Likes Received:
    1,114
    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2010
    Location:
    Arrow Repaired
    Rating
    100%
    Which science??? LOL .....so much long standing science has been proven wrong it’s scary (particularly health care)
     
  3. JD8

    JD8 Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    20,107
    Likes Received:
    2,863
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Location:
    Tulsa
    Rating
    100%


    Science is a method and process of gathering information to determine legitimacy of facts by repeatable results. It's a tool, not a data point.
     
  4. Snattlerake

    Snattlerake Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    367
    Likes Received:
    310
    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2019
    Location:
    OKC
    Rating
    100%
    That is so funny seeing Obama saying that.
     
  5. Glocktogo

    Glocktogo Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    24,506
    Likes Received:
    3,776
    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Location:
    Collinsville
    Rating
    100%
    Yep. Shame it's so frequently misused. :(
     
  6. ignerntbend

    ignerntbend Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    12,308
    Likes Received:
    897
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    saw on the web where the Iball was so irreducibly complex that nature couldn't never have come up with it. You never hear about that. You never hear about that.
     
  7. Dale00

    Dale00 Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    4,958
    Likes Received:
    1,054
    Joined:
    May 28, 2006
    Location:
    Oklahoma
    It is self-correcting but sometimes this takes a long time. Truth eventually emerges though experimentation.

    A big part of the problem is that lots of people wave the science flag as a way of bolstering their claims. Some things cannot be tested through experimentation and scientists make "educated" guesses (or even "SWAGs")....this is problematic...it is not really science imo if no experimental verification is possible. Modelling is not real science imo either - it is based on too many possibily incorrect assumptions and the modelers keep make making little changes whenever their beloved models don't quite predict correctly..."This time it's fixed for sure".

    Can entire scientific disciplines (or self-proclaimed scientific disciplines) be hijacked for social justice causes? yes.
     
    Last edited: Feb 13, 2019
  8. dennishoddy

    dennishoddy Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    60,075
    Likes Received:
    12,966
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2008
    Location:
    Ponca City Ok
    Rating
    100%
    Kind of like the entire premise of global warming was based on computer models that can be altered and have?
     
  9. NightShade

    NightShade Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    3,286
    Likes Received:
    921
    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2013
    Location:
    Guthrie
    Rating
    100%

    Not to mention only bases on recorded history which is a fraction of what has really happened. And as far as solar output we have even less data, like maybe 50 years worth if we are lucky.
     
  10. jfssms

    jfssms Sharpshooter

    Messages:
    4,121
    Likes Received:
    53
    Joined:
    May 24, 2008
    Location:
    okc
    Rating
    100%
    It kind of depends on the season.
     

Share This Page