Who has the most warning points?

[SlugSlinger]

Pretty sad that a group of adults need to be managed, and have warnings doled out for bad behavior like children.

Is it sad because of the “adults” or the system?

 

[Pstmstr]

I tell you what boys, I'm hanging on. I don't want to set the record, and I plan to post less and say fewer naughty things. I'm hanging on and I'm not kidding. I have seven warning points, which i never meant to have. I'm determined to never get a single one more.
My question is : does anyone have more warning points than me? You may come from a pretty good family. You may not be anymore profane than me. Do you have more warning points?

I am not trying to set the record, and I hope that you aren't either.

0 since 2006 but then again I don’t have 16,000 posts of useless drivel. There should be an age and maturity level test before some are allowed on here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[El Pablo]

0 since 2006 but then again I don’t have 16,000 posts of useless drivel. There should be an age and maturity level test before some are allowed on here.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

If there is a maturity test, none of the people I've met and liked on OSA would have been allowed to have joined OSA.

Oh, now I see what you are doing. Hint taken.

 

[ignerntbend]

Guys, please. I've bypassed the censor in the ordinary way that a lot of people do every day. I've been told to spell the word and let the censer take care of it. People follow me around and report me because I'm an ******* which is the last word I got banned for because the censor doesn't account for it and people use it frequently.
Think of it this way, postmaster: You need people like me to bounce off of. All things exist through opposition.
If I weren't so wicked, you wouldn't be so righteous.

 

[Aries]

It is. But we all know that there are some people who just needed to go away. The way it's set up now is a fair and equitable way to make sure the forum's rules are followed. Is there a better way? Would you prefer to have no moderation?

Anyone who remembers usenet probably knows that with no moderation, it inevitably devolves into 98% spam and childish name calling arguments.

 

[Profreedomokie]

Joel I think you're doing a fine job. Somebody has to be the adult and most of us don't qualify .

 

[ignerntbend]

It's also worth mentioning that it's OK on here to threaten the life of Mike Pence, the Vice President of the United States as long as you don't use a dirty word.
It's perfectly ok for you to encourage the Vice President's murder, as long as you don't say anything naughty.

 

[RickN]

Joel I think you're doing a fine job. Somebody has to be the adult and most of us don't qualify .

Most of us have passed adult and are into senility. Iggy is a prime example.

 

[ignerntbend]

Most of us have passed adult and are into senility. Iggy is a prime example.

Uhhh... I know we're the same age,Rick. But I'm not the one who gets trolled everyday by everything he sees on the internet.

 

[jakeman]

Yeah but how many does your other account have?

.................................16,000 posts of useless drivel.

This what I don't understand. As tightly moderated as the site is, and that's not a bad thing, why are sock accounts allowed to exist?
Most other forums where I'm a member do not allow sock accounts. On a first offense, the sock is deleted. If the user persists and opens another sock account, both are deleted and that person is no longer allowed to be a member.

Again, considering what this site is, and the constant chirping about "community" and what not, I find it a little hard to believe a user that never has anything useful to add to the forum would be allowed to post troll posts in that kind of volume.

I'm not saying anything about anyone in particular, I"m just commenting on the above quoted posts.