Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch, Federal Pot Policy....

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Hobbes

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 5, 2008
Messages
8,737
Reaction score
749
Location
The Nations
Congress quietly ends federal government's ban on medical marijuana


Tucked deep inside the 1,603-page federal spending measure is a provision that effectively ends the federal government's prohibition on medical marijuana and signals a major shift in drug policy.

The bill's passage over the weekend marks the first time Congress has approved nationally significant legislation backed by legalization advocates. It brings almost to a close two decades of tension between the states and Washington over medical use of marijuana.

Under the provision, states where medical pot is legal would no longer need to worry about federal drug agents raiding retail operations. Agents would be prohibited from doing so.

The Obama administration has largely followed that rule since last year as a matter of policy. But the measure approved as part of the spending bill, which President Obama plans to sign this week, will codify it as a matter of law.

Pot advocates had lobbied Congress to embrace the administration's policy, which they warned was vulnerable to revision under a less tolerant future administration.
More important, from the standpoint of activists, Congress' action marked the emergence of a new alliance in marijuana politics: Republicans are taking a prominent role in backing states' right to allow use of a drug the federal government still officially classifies as more dangerous than cocaine.

"This is a victory for so many," said the measure's coauthor, Republican Rep. Dana Rohrabacher of Costa Mesa. The measure's approval, he said, represents "the first time in decades that the federal government has curtailed its oppressive prohibition of marijuana."

By now, 32 states and the District of Columbia have legalized pot or its ingredients to treat ailments, a movement that began in the 1990s. Even back then, some states had been approving broader decriminalization measures for two decades.

The medical marijuana movement has picked up considerable momentum in recent years.
The Drug Enforcement Administration, however, continues to place marijuana in the most dangerous category of narcotics, with no accepted medical use.

Congress for years had resisted calls to allow states to chart their own path on pot.
The marijuana measure, which forbids the federal government from using any of its resources to impede state medical marijuana laws, was previously rejected half a dozen times.
When Washington, D.C., voters approved medical marijuana in 1998, Congress used its authority over the city's affairs to block the law from taking effect for 11 years.

Even as Congress has shifted ground on medical marijuana, lawmakers remain uneasy about full legalization. A separate amendment to the spending package, tacked on at the behest of anti-marijuana crusader Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.), will jeopardize the legalization of recreational pot in Washington, D.C., which voters approved last month.

Marijuana proponents nonetheless said they felt more confident than ever that Congress was drifting toward their point of view.
"The war on medical marijuana is over," said Bill Piper, a lobbyist with the Drug Policy Alliance, who called the move historic.

"Now the fight moves on to legalization of all marijuana," he said. "This is the strongest signal we have received from Congress [that] the politics have really shifted. ... Congress has been slow to catch up with the states and American people, but it is catching up."

The measure, which Rohrabacher championed with Rep. Sam Farr, a Democrat from Carmel, had the support of large numbers of Democrats for years.
Enough Republicans joined them this year to put it over the top.
When the House first passed the measure earlier this year, 49 Republicans voted aye.

Some Republicans are pivoting off their traditional anti-drug platform at a time when most voters live in states where medical marijuana is legal, in many cases as a result of ballot measures.
Polls show that while Republican voters are far less likely than the broader public to support outright legalization, they favor allowing marijuana for medical use by a commanding majority. Legalization also has great appeal to millennials, a demographic group with which Republicans are aggressively trying to make inroads.

Approval of the pot measure comes after the Obama administration directed federal prosecutors last year to stop enforcing drug laws that contradict state marijuana policies.
Since then, federal raids of marijuana merchants and growers who are operating legally in their states have been limited to those accused of other violations, such as money laundering.

"The federal government should never get in between patients and their medicine," said Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Oakland).
 

donner

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 22, 2005
Messages
5,901
Reaction score
2,107
Location
Oxford, MS
Wanna bet thats not far away? Money. Big business. Government can make a lot of money on it.

the fact that the .gov can't tax a plant you can grow (without much effort in some places) in your own backyard has probably been one of the big reasons why it's been illegal for so long.

I'm happy to see this medical stuff get sorted out. My wife was prescribed (by a legit doctor in memphis) the synthetic version of THC for her chronic (i.e. Unrelenting) headache (she has one the same one, all day, every day, since august of 2011).

Since big pharm made it, it has to be better than the plant version, right? In short, no. I can get into more details, but you all get the idea. I know people will be along shortly to tell me i'm wrong and that the sky is falling, but i will state that my view has changed a lot since having dealt with a medical issue that even the doctors at the Mayo Clinic couldn't fix.
 

nofearfactor

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Mar 24, 2007
Messages
7,265
Reaction score
291
Location
cold, dark
the fact that the .gov can't tax a plant you can grow (without much effort in some places) in your own backyard has probably been one of the big reasons why it's been illegal for so long.

I'm happy to see this medical stuff get sorted out. My wife was prescribed (by a legit doctor in memphis) the synthetic version of THC for her chronic (i.e. Unrelenting) headache (she has one the same one, all day, every day, since august of 2011).

Since big pharm made it, it has to be better than the plant version, right? In short, no. I can get into more details, but you all get the idea. I know people will be along shortly to tell me i'm wrong and that the sky is falling, but i will state that my view has changed a lot since having dealt with a medical issue that even the doctors at the Mayo Clinic couldn't fix.

You can make your own beer and moonshine too if you know how but it sure is alot easier just going to the liquor store to get a bottle as the variety is greater than what you would make on your own, same as with MJ and the dispensaries. A patient or imbiber can go in to the dispensary and get the medicine or budd that suits their ailment or desire and choose from a larger variety than they can by growing their own. People who know how will grow their own in small amounts as they can do legally in CO and WA especially if they need or like a certain strain then thats the best way to do it anyways, but most people who are smoking for pleasure like a variety and will still go to the dispensary even if theyre growing some of their own.

Living in northern CA near where alot of my neighbors were 'growers' I got to know this other side (medical) of it from watching the very people who were the pioneers in the medical MJ movement. Friends I have from CA and from Tulsa are now all living in CO running businesses in the industry in the Denver area and have been there since day one of the movement. They started out there helping medical patients and are still catering mostly to their roster of patients who depend on their edibles and plants. I know these people well and their house is where I stay when I visit there several times a year and I know for fact that they actually care about helping their patients with their ailments way more than the big money every one thinks they all make. They put their money right back into their businesses after they pay for security, attorneys, etc. They arent getting rich from it from what Ive noticed and they help alot of people out so I guess its a win-win for everybody there.

Do I think it would work in OK nope, not the casual side of the industry anyways, the medical side I can see working here to help people, but this place is too stiff for allowing totally legal weed here. The 2nd to last state to allow tattooing. The bible belt buckle. Red state. Far right siders. It will be a fight here even if the Feds allow legal casual smoking all over the US. People and even LEOs here say theyre all for decriminalizing it, but all out legal I dont see it happening, that would be just way too much liberal-ness for this place.
 

Werewolf

Sharpshooter
Special Hen
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
3,471
Reaction score
7
Location
OKC
Legalized pot in OK?

HAH!!!

We still had deFacto prohibition here until - what - the late 70's? And if I'm not mistaken aren't there still some dry OK counties?

Legalized pot? YEAHHHHHHHH. RiiiiiiiGHT.
 

Latest posts

Top Bottom