|
|
After three state climatologists said their data did not support any such conclusion and were FIRED for it, the number of professional degree meteorologists being paid by government agencies or living on NSF Grants willing to risk losing their living has gone virtually to zero. Retirees like myself and the founder of the weather channel (also retired) openly disagree with it. If I were still working for the government, I would have to have "no comment" to keep my job. I know several senior meteorologists still working for NWS that are doing exactly that.Perhaps, but the leftists will simply say that those 1100 aren't a part of the "97% of scientists" that say it is an emergency.
I'd really like to know by what criteria those in the 97% were polled to get the answer the leftists wanted.
The "No Climate Emergency Scientists" say one thing, the "Climate Emergency Scientists" say another, how do you decide which group is right?
Enter your email address to join: