This thread reminds me that I wouldn't mind learning a trade after I finish college.
Ha ha. Except the even when tort reform is in place, the malpractice carriers do not reduce their premiums. A lot of docs got bamboozled by that line.
Why would they not reduce their premiums if the chances of a doctor getting sued go down? If even one malpractice carrier decreased rates all of them would have to follow suit to remain competitive would they not?
Malpractice insurance has few regulations on it, most insurances use it to pad the bottom line.
Granted, but how long would it take any given carrier to exploit a competitive advantage in the presence of tort reform?
Okay JB, if you go down to any emergence room in the state I promise you. You will find Illegal aliens receiving care. They have no intention on paying the bill there for it gets passed on the rest of us. It is my understanding that they cannot refuse treatment.
First of all, insurance companies rarely ever lower premiums.
Secondly, doctors are almost pathological in their fear of lawsuits. The insurance companies know that and charge accordingly.
That probably uses enough tax dollars to produce a loud sucking sound. Yes...that was a Ross Perot reference.People use our ER as their PCP
Isn't this because of ever increasing demand as opposed to a decreased demand as a result of some sort of magic tort reform elixir though? It only makes good business sense to not reduce prices in the face of rising demand, but what about in the face of falling demand?
Would they still be so pathologically afraid if they felt better protected?
No, the insurance companies start in on them early. Look, doctors are going to make mistakes. When they do, they should have malpractice insurance that covers them. Most of you guys agree that people should have auto liability insurance, so what is the difference?
Enter your email address to join: