They recommended ‘Life with the possibility of parole’. Not just ‘Life’.
Same here. But people had better behave themselves no matter what is decided, don't think that the bs that has happened elsewhere will be put up with here. But I could be wrong.
They wiped it pretty quick last time. I've got plenty of faith between OCPD, OHP and OCSO.
What I'd like to know is why the Pardon and parole Board voted for clemency. What was their reasoning, (1) were they afraid of personal retaliation, (b) were they afraid of violent protests in the Oklahoma City, or (3) is it race-based PC? Or could there have been another reason? The jury said he was guilty based on the evidence presented and he was sentenced by a judge.... The P&P Board's rationale is conspicuously absent. Beats me.
Not in Oklahoma. Jury decides guilty or innocent. Then the next step is the jury decides on sentencing based on the law… the judge reads the law to them and their sentencing choices but it is the 12 that decides…. At least that’s how it was when I was a juror on a criminal case a few years back.
95% chance he lets the death sentence stand.
5% chance he changes the sentence to life without parole.
0% chance he agrees with the Clemency board and changes the sentence to life with parole.
5% chance he changes the sentence to life without parole.
0% chance he agrees with the Clemency board and changes the sentence to life with parole.
I agree with you and this is the problem with the country now. Spineless politicians let public opinion rule. I say screw Hollywood and fry him.
Add the overly dramatic media talking heads manipulating the mindless social media addicts.
Similar threads
